Parameter
- 198 Seiten
- 7 Lesestunden
Mehr zum Buch
"Most people believe that we have both [free will and responsibility] - that is, that our choices, decisions, and actions are neither determined nor undetermined but rather fully self-determined. By contrast, most philosophers understand just how difficult it is to defend this 'metaphysical libertarian' position. So they tend to opt for two other theories: 'responsibility skepticism' (which denies the very possibility of free will and responsibility) and 'compatibilism' (which reduces free will and responsibility to properties that are compatible with determinism). In opposition to both of these theories, [the author] explains how free will and responsibility are indeed metaphysically possible. But [the author] also cautions against the dogma that metaphysical libertarianism is actually true, a widespread belief that continues to cause serious social, political, and legal harms."--
Buchkauf
Free Will, Responsibility, and Crime, Ken M. Levy
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2019
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Paperback)
Keiner hat bisher bewertet.
- Titel
- Free Will, Responsibility, and Crime
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Autor*innen
- Ken M. Levy
- Verlag
- Taylor & Francis Inc
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2019
- Einband
- Paperback
- Seitenzahl
- 198
- ISBN10
- 0815369662
- ISBN13
- 9780815369660
- Reihe
- Schlagwörter
- Sachbücher, Sozialwissenschaften, Handel, Wirtschaft & Management, Rechtsthematik, Recht
- Beschreibung
- "Most people believe that we have both [free will and responsibility] - that is, that our choices, decisions, and actions are neither determined nor undetermined but rather fully self-determined. By contrast, most philosophers understand just how difficult it is to defend this 'metaphysical libertarian' position. So they tend to opt for two other theories: 'responsibility skepticism' (which denies the very possibility of free will and responsibility) and 'compatibilism' (which reduces free will and responsibility to properties that are compatible with determinism). In opposition to both of these theories, [the author] explains how free will and responsibility are indeed metaphysically possible. But [the author] also cautions against the dogma that metaphysical libertarianism is actually true, a widespread belief that continues to cause serious social, political, and legal harms."--