Wir senden dir das abgebildete Buch

Political Philosophy versus History?

Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought

Autoren

Buchbewertung

3,4(3)Abgeben

Parameter

Mehr zum Buch

Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.

Buchkauf

Political Philosophy versus History?, Jonathan Floyd, Marc Stears

Sprache
Erscheinungsdatum: 2011
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding: (Paperback),
Buchzustand: Gebraucht - Sehr gut
Preis: 10,49 €inkl. MwSt.

Lieferung

Zahlungsmethoden

3,4

Gut

3 Bewertung

Abgeben

Hier könnte deine Bwertung stehen.

Titel: Political Philosophy versus History?
Untertitel: Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought
Sprache: Englisch
Autor*innen: Jonathan Floyd, Marc Stears
Verlag: Cambridge University Press
Erscheinungsdatum: 2011
Einband: Paperback
ISBN10: 0521146887
ISBN13: 9780521146883
Schlagwörter: Geschichte, Philosophie
Bewertung: 3,35 von 5 Sternen
Beschreibung: Is the way in which political philosophy is conducted today too ahistorical? Does such ahistoricism render political philosophy too abstract? Is political philosophy thus incapable of dealing with the realities of political life? This volume brings together some of the world's leading political philosophers to address these crucial questions. The contributors focus especially on political philosophy's pretensions to universality and on its strained relationship with the world of real politics. Some chapters argue that political philosophers should not be cowed by the accusations levied against them from outside of their own field. Others insist that these accusations require a dramatic reshaping of normative political thought. The volume will spark controversy across political philosophy and beyond.