Bookbot

Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law

Autor*innen

Parameter

  • 398 Seiten
  • 14 Lesestunden

Mehr zum Buch

This book takes a theoretical approach to comparative law, focusing on its epistemology and methodology rather than just legal doctrine. It engages in a lively discussion about the types of 'knowledge' that can be derived from comparative law and analyzes the concept of 'legal families,' questioning whether distinctions among them are necessary based on different legal areas. The essays explore the appropriate levels for conducting research—whether at a technical 'surface level,' a deeper ideological and practical level, or an intermediate level that considers socio-economic and historical contexts. One section questions how to identify and define a 'legal system,' addressing the tension between 'legal monism' and 'legal pluralism,' as well as the nature of European legal orders and sub-State systems in relation to traditional sovereign legal frameworks. The final part contemplates the feasibility and desirability of creating a common legal language, including shared principles and concepts, to be utilized in the evolving European legal landscape. Collectively, the papers aim to tackle fundamental scientific issues in comparative research that are often overlooked in existing scholarship.

Buchkauf

Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law, Mark van Hoecke

Sprache
Erscheinungsdatum
2004
Einband
(Hardcover)
Wir benachrichtigen dich per E-Mail.

Lieferung

  • Gratis Versand ab 14,99 € in ganz Deutschland! Mehr Infos.

Zahlungsmethoden

Keiner hat bisher bewertet.Abgeben

Titel
Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law
Sprache
Englisch
Autor*innen
Mark van Hoecke
Erscheinungsdatum
2004
Einband
Hardcover
Seitenzahl
398
ISBN10
1841134430
ISBN13
9781841134437
Reihe
Schlagwörter
Beschreibung
This book takes a theoretical approach to comparative law, focusing on its epistemology and methodology rather than just legal doctrine. It engages in a lively discussion about the types of 'knowledge' that can be derived from comparative law and analyzes the concept of 'legal families,' questioning whether distinctions among them are necessary based on different legal areas. The essays explore the appropriate levels for conducting research—whether at a technical 'surface level,' a deeper ideological and practical level, or an intermediate level that considers socio-economic and historical contexts. One section questions how to identify and define a 'legal system,' addressing the tension between 'legal monism' and 'legal pluralism,' as well as the nature of European legal orders and sub-State systems in relation to traditional sovereign legal frameworks. The final part contemplates the feasibility and desirability of creating a common legal language, including shared principles and concepts, to be utilized in the evolving European legal landscape. Collectively, the papers aim to tackle fundamental scientific issues in comparative research that are often overlooked in existing scholarship.