The process of European constitutionalisation has met with scepticism in current national legal and political spheres and in European circles of public opinion. Examining these concerns, this book reveals a widespread misunderstanding of constitutional federalism which permeates the Member State courts, popular media, and many academic communities.
Cambridge Studien zur Verfassungsrecht Reihe
Diese Reihe widmet sich führenden Monographien im Verfassungsrecht, einschließlich Menschenrechten, Verwaltungsrecht und Verfassungstheorie. Sie fördert vielfältige akademische Ansätze und richtet sich an ein internationales Publikum. Beiträge werden unabhängig von ihrem Geltungsbereich aufgenommen, seien sie singulär, vergleichend oder theoretisch. Die Reihe begrüßt auch Studien, die Schnittstellen des Verfassungsrechts mit dem Völkerrecht untersuchen und Rechtsordnungen verschiedener Rechtssysteme verbinden.






For those interested in the relationship between politics, power and constitutions, this book examines the idea of prerogative power and reason of state by looking at the theoretical debates surrounding the development of the British constitution and the British Empire, singling out the East India Company as a focal point.
The Politics of Principle
The First South African Constitutional Court, 1995 2005
- 450 Seiten
- 16 Lesestunden
Focusing on a single-country case study, this book explores the significant impact of constitutional courts in emerging democracies. It delves into their functions, challenges, and contributions to the legal and political landscape, providing valuable insights into how these institutions shape democratic governance and uphold constitutional principles. Through detailed analysis, it enhances the understanding of the interplay between law and democracy in contemporary contexts.
The book explores the tension between judicial authority and democratic legitimacy, positing that judges often limit their exercise of power to maintain an appearance of democratic fairness. It argues that this restraint can lead to the erosion of individual rights, as the judiciary prioritizes its legitimacy over full protection of those rights. Through this analysis, the author critiques the balance between judicial responsibility and the imperative to uphold personal freedoms in a democratic society.
The book advocates for the constitutionalization of social rights, emphasizing their importance in promoting justice and equity. Jeff King proposes an incrementalist strategy for judicial enforcement, suggesting that gradual changes can effectively integrate social rights into the legal framework. This approach aims to balance the need for immediate action with the complexities of legal and political systems, ultimately fostering a more inclusive understanding of rights within constitutional law.
The book delves into the intricacies of constitutional rights, examining their extent and the inherent conflicts that arise between them. Aharon Barak explores the legal limitations placed on these rights, providing a comprehensive analysis of how they interact within the framework of law. Through this exploration, the author sheds light on the balance between individual freedoms and societal needs, offering insights into the complexities of constitutional law.