Digital Cosmopolitans
- 320 Seiten
- 12 Lesestunden
A rousing call to action for those who would be citizens of the world-online and off.
Ethan Zuckerman ist ein führender Medienwissenschaftler, Internetaktivist und Blogger, der sich auf die Schnittstelle von Technologie und bürgerlichem Leben konzentriert. Seine Arbeit untersucht, wie digitale Medien den öffentlichen Diskurs und sozialen Wandel prägen können. Zuckerman erforscht die ethischen und praktischen Auswirkungen von Online-Plattformen auf Demokratie und bürgerschaftliches Engagement. Seine Erkenntnisse beleuchten die Herausforderungen und Chancen unseres digitalen Zeitalters.



A rousing call to action for those who would be citizens of the world-online and off.
The rise of mistrust is provoking a crisis for representative democracy- solutions lie in the endless creativity of social movements.
A close reading of Wikipedia’s article on the Egyptian Revolution reveals the complexity inherent in establishing the facts of events as they occur and are relayed to audiences near and far. Wikipedia bills itself as an encyclopedia built on neutrality, authority, and crowd-sourced consensus. Platforms like Google and digital assistants like Siri distribute Wikipedia’s facts widely, further burnishing its veneer of impartiality. But as Heather Ford demonstrates in Writing the Revolution, the facts that appear on Wikipedia are often the result of protracted power struggles over how data are created and used, how history is written and by whom, and the very definition of facts in a digital age. In Writing the Revolution, Ford looks critically at how the Wikipedia article about the 2011 Egyptian Revolution evolved over the course of a decade, both shaping and being shaped by the Revolution as it happened. When data are published in real time, they are subject to an intense battle over their meaning across multiple fronts. Ford answers key questions about how Wikipedia’s so-called consensus is arrived at; who has the power to write dominant histories and which knowledges are actively rejected; how these battles play out across the chains of circulation in which data travel; and whether history is now written by algorithms.