Hans Delbrück und Weimar
Für eine konservative Republik – gegen Kriegsschuldlüge und Dolchstoßlegende
Autoren
Parameter
Mehr zum Buch
Hans Delbrück (1848–1929), a public conservative intellectual, lived during the time of the Weimar Republic. He published a lot of articles for several newspapers and was involved in the following three major political debates: Firstly he made as a 'Vernunftrepublikaner' several proposals to bring the new republic to a success, even though he was still convinced of the Prussian-German monarchy. Secondly he researched the war guilt question, harshly criticized the assumption that Germany was the only guilty state and pleaded for a fair-minded approach to reach a reconciliation with all European nations. Thirdly Delbrück rejected as a protagonist the stab-in-the-back legend and proved as a leading military (civil) historian that Germany suffered a military defeat different to the general claim. In contrast to the radical proposals from the political left and right, Delbrück started with these alternative explanations a fruitful debate to strengthen the young German republic.
Buchkauf
Hans Delbrück und Weimar, Christian Lüdtke
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2018
Lieferung
Zahlungsmethoden
Feedback senden
- Titel
- Hans Delbrück und Weimar
- Untertitel
- Für eine konservative Republik – gegen Kriegsschuldlüge und Dolchstoßlegende
- Sprache
- Deutsch
- Autor*innen
- Christian Lüdtke
- Verlag
- Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2018
- ISBN10
- 3525370636
- ISBN13
- 9783525370636
- Kategorie
- Weltgeschichte
- Beschreibung
- Hans Delbrück (1848–1929), a public conservative intellectual, lived during the time of the Weimar Republic. He published a lot of articles for several newspapers and was involved in the following three major political debates: Firstly he made as a 'Vernunftrepublikaner' several proposals to bring the new republic to a success, even though he was still convinced of the Prussian-German monarchy. Secondly he researched the war guilt question, harshly criticized the assumption that Germany was the only guilty state and pleaded for a fair-minded approach to reach a reconciliation with all European nations. Thirdly Delbrück rejected as a protagonist the stab-in-the-back legend and proved as a leading military (civil) historian that Germany suffered a military defeat different to the general claim. In contrast to the radical proposals from the political left and right, Delbrück started with these alternative explanations a fruitful debate to strengthen the young German republic.