After the Pinochet case. What is the current state of international law concerning heads of state in domestic courts for the international crime of torture

Focusing on the intersection of international law and domestic courts, this essay explores the accountability of heads of state for torture. It highlights the landmark Pinochet case, which redefined the scope of functional immunity and diplomatic immunity in relation to torture. By analyzing additional cases, the essay examines how courts interpret current international law, providing insights into the evolving legal landscape surrounding state immunity and human rights violations.