Common Law Theory
- 262 Seiten
- 10 Lesestunden
In this book, an international team of scholars analyse the common law through three of its classic themes: rules, reasoning and constitutionalism.
Diese Reihe widmet sich Spitzenforschung an der Schnittstelle von Philosophie und Recht. Sie veröffentlicht kühne Monografien und sorgfältig redigierte Aufsatzsammlungen, die die Grenzen der Rechtstheorie erweitern. Ziel ist es, traditionelle Rechtswissenschaften mit anderen Geisteswissenschaften zu verbinden und ein breites Fachpublikum anzusprechen. Leser, die an interdisziplinären Ansätzen im Recht interessiert sind, finden hier zum Nachdenken anregende und originelle Arbeiten.
In this book, an international team of scholars analyse the common law through three of its classic themes: rules, reasoning and constitutionalism.
Exploring the intricate dynamics of collective responsibility and individual guilt, this book delves into how societal institutions complicate moral accountability. It critiques Kantianism and consequentialism for their shortcomings in addressing complicity, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of accountability. By examining our relationships within social groups, the author presents a philosophical framework that emphasizes the necessity of individual responsibility in the context of collective actions, reshaping contemporary moral theory.
Focusing on the pursuit of truth in criminal trials, the book critiques current rules of evidence and procedure that hinder this objective. Larry Laudan systematically analyzes the mechanisms of error distribution, including standards of proof and the presumption of innocence, to highlight how these elements reflect society's views on trial errors. By addressing these fundamental issues, the work aims to propose a framework that aligns the criminal justice system more closely with its purported goal of truth-seeking.
Focusing on the denial of essential resources and opportunities for women, this work by Timothy Macklem challenges conventional views on discrimination. It posits that the core issue is not merely unfavorable comparisons to men's treatment but the lack of support necessary for women to thrive. This thought-provoking analysis is poised to make a significant impact in discussions about gender equality, appealing to students and professionals in legal theory and gender studies.
This book focuses on the degree to which certain moral and legal doctrines are rooted in specific passions that are then institutionalised in the form of criminal law. Murphy also analyses philosophical arguments about the nature of forgiveness and mercy in the legal process.
The book explores the interplay between responsibility and luck, delving into their implications within tort law, criminal law, and the principles of distributive justice. It analyzes how these concepts influence legal outcomes and moral judgments, providing a comprehensive examination of their significance in various legal contexts. Through critical insights, it challenges traditional notions of accountability and fairness, making it a thought-provoking read for those interested in law and ethics.
The book explores the central thesis of natural law jurisprudence, emphasizing that law is grounded in compelling reasons for compliance. Mark C. Murphy illustrates how the binding nature of law is linked to the common good of the political community, positioning natural law as a critical yet often misunderstood aspect of political philosophy. Through this lens, the work aims to clarify the significance of natural law in shaping legal and political frameworks.
A wide-ranging collection of essays from a leading scholar of legal ethics.
In this thought-provoking book, Alexander critically examines the notion of freedom of expression as a human right. He argues that while legal protection for this freedom is valuable, it cannot be universally categorized as a human right. The book is accessible and relevant for students and professionals in various fields.
Focusing on the philosophical underpinnings of international criminal law, the book explores the moral, legal, and political dilemmas surrounding accountability for collective crimes like crimes against humanity. It examines the tension between individual accountability and state sovereignty, emphasizing that breaches of sovereignty must be justified under specific conditions. This analysis is particularly relevant for students of international law, political philosophy, international relations, and human rights theory, offering insights into the complexities of justice on a global scale.