Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch 1993
- 206 Seiten
- 8 Lesestunden






The essays in this volume explore the moral foundations and the political prospects of the welfare state in the United States. Among the questions addressed are the following: Has public support for the welfare state faded? Can a democratic state provide welfare without producing dependency on welfare? Is a capitalist (or socialist) economy consistent with the preservation of equal liberty and equal opportunity for all citizens? Why and in what ways does the welfare state discriminate against women? Can we justify limiting immigration for the sake of safeguarding the welfare of Americans? How can elementary and secondary education be distributed consistently with democratic values? The volume confronts powerful criticisms that have been leveled against the welfare state by conservatives, liberals, and radicals and suggests reforms in welfare state programs that might meet these criticisms. The contributors are Joseph H. Carens, Jon Elster, Robert K. Fullinwider, Amy Gutmann, Jennifer L. Hochschild, Stanley Kelley, Jr., Richard Krouse, Michael McPherson, J. Donald Moon, Carole Pateman, Dennis Thompson, and Michael Walzer.-- "Economics and Philosophy"
Eva's life is full of big balloons of questions that she carries around all day -- until she finds the answer she's looking for. A humorous and heart- warming bilingual story about young children's natural curiosity -- with warm and vibrant illustrations.
The din and deadlock of public life in America highlight the deep disagreements permeating our democracy, characterized by political and moral divisions. Citizens and their representatives increasingly adopt extreme and intransigent positions, necessitating a better kind of public discussion. Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson advocate for "deliberative democracy," offering a principled framework for opponents to engage on moral and political issues. They illustrate how deliberative democracy can tackle contentious topics such as abortion, affirmative action, health care, and welfare, enabling diverse groups separated by class, race, religion, and gender to reason together. Their exploration goes beyond typical political theory by addressing both the principles of reasonable argument and their practical application. The authors propose that enhancing our capacity for moral argument is preferable to relegating disagreements to procedural politics or judicial institutions. This work presents a compelling approach to resolving significant moral disagreements and managing those that will inevitably persist, fostering a respectful dialogue among all participants.
Americans today pay far more for health care while having among the lowest life expectancies and highest infant mortality of any affluent nation. Gutmann and Moreno explain how bioethics came to dominate the national spotlight, leading and responding to a revolution in doctor-patient relations, a burgeoning world of organ transplants, and new reproductive technologies that benefit millions but create a host of legal and ethical challenges. They address head-on the most fundamental challenges in American health care, while exploring the American paradox of wanting to have it all without paying the price. --adapted from jacket
In her later years, novelist Elizabeth Costello becomes consumed by the idea of human cruelty to animals, leading her to avoid eye contact with others. She perceives meat-eaters as conspirators in a vast crime occurring in farms, slaughterhouses, and laboratories worldwide. Her son, a physics professor, admires her literary accomplishments but dreads her animal rights lectures at his college, where her views are met with skepticism. Colleagues challenge her assertion that human reasoning is overrated and that life's value isn't diminished by the inability to reason. At a dinner following her lecture, guests express a range of reactions to animal rights, sparking discussions that touch on philosophical, anthropological, and religious themes. While her son finds her views offensive and eccentric, he also recognizes their unsettling validity. Nobel Prize-winning author J.M. Coetzee uses fiction to explore the complexities of animal rights through Costello's experiences of mortality, compassion for animals, and alienation from humanity, including her family. Presented as a Tanner Lecture at Princeton University, the narrative engages with literature, philosophy, and deep convictions, followed by responses from prominent thinkers. Coetzee's work, alongside essays from various scholars, delves into the social ramifications of moral conflict and confrontation.
Mstitel - Frederick Forsyth / Flirtování s Petem - Barbara Delinsky / Výročí - Amy Gutman / Podivný případ se psem - Mark Haddon
Charles Taylor greift in seinem Essay eines der brennenden Gegenwartsprobleme liberaler Demokratien auf: Gleichbehandlung der Individuen bei Achtung kultureller und ethnischer Identitäten. Die prekäre Dialektik von Universalismus und Partikularismus, die auch im Schlagwort von der »multikulturellen Gesellschaft« widerhallt, analysiert er ideengeschichtlich sowie politisch-praktisch an den zeitgenössischen westlichen Gesellschaften. Er beschreibt den Wertewandel, die Selbstbehauptungswünsche von Minderheiten und die rechtlichen Widersprüche in den Autonomiebestrebungen von Volksgruppen. Taylors Analyse ist ein Glücksfall und das Buch mit den Kommentaren von führenden Sozialphilosophen einer der wichtigsten Diskussionsbeiträge zum Thema »Multikulturalismus«.