Parameter
- 400 Seiten
- 14 Lesestunden
Mehr zum Buch
An illumination of one of the most explosive and publicized "holocaust trials" since that of Adolf Eichmann, by a leading historian who acted as chief adviser to the defenseIn ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.
Buchkauf
Telling lies about Hitler, Richard J. Evans
- Sprache
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2002
- product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
- (Paperback)
Hier könnte deine Bewertung stehen.
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Autor*innen
- Richard J. Evans
- Verlag
- Verso
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 2002
- Einband
- Paperback
- Seitenzahl
- 400
- ISBN10
- 1859844170
- ISBN13
- 9781859844175
- Reihe
- Schlagwörter
- Sachbücher, Sozialwissenschaften, Historisches Thema, Geschichte, Politikwissenschaft, Politik, Narrativer Journalismus, Deutschland, Militärgeschichte, Kriege, Zweiter Weltkrieg, Holocaust, Nazismus, Adolf Hitler, Gerichte, Gerichtsverfahren, Fakten
- Erstveröffentlichung
- 2001
- Originaltitel
- Telling Lies about Hitler
- Bewertung
- 4,1 von 5 Sternen
- Beschreibung
- An illumination of one of the most explosive and publicized "holocaust trials" since that of Adolf Eichmann, by a leading historian who acted as chief adviser to the defenseIn ruling against the controversial historian David Irving, whose libel suit against the American historian Deborah Lipstadt was tried in April 2000, the High Court in London labeled Irving a falsifier of history. No objective historian, declared the judge, would manipulate the documentary record in the way that Irving did. Richard J. Evans, a Cambridge historian and the chief adviser for the defense, uses this famous trial as a lens for exploring a range of difficult questions about the nature of the historian's enterprise.