Gratis Versand ab 16,99 €. Mehr Infos.
Bookbot

Why it does not have to be in focus: modern photography explained

Autor*innen

Buchbewertung

Parameter

  • 224 Seiten
  • 8 Lesestunden

Mehr zum Buch

Why take a self-portrait but obscure your face with a lightbulb (Lee Friedlander, Provincetown, Cape Cod, Massachusetts (1968)? Or deliberately underexpose an image (Vera Lutter, Battersea Power Station, XI: July 13, 2004)? And why photograph a ceiling (William Eggleston, Red Ceiling, 1973)? In Why It Does Not Have To Be In Focus, Jackie Higgins offers a lively, informed defence of modern photography. Choosing 100 key photographs with particular emphasis on the last twenty years she examines what inspired each photographer in the first place, and traces how the piece was executed. In doing so, she brings to light the layers of meaning and artifice behind these singular works, some of which were initially dismissed out of hand for being blurred, overexposed or badly composed.

Publikation

Buchkauf

Why it does not have to be in focus: modern photography explained, Jackie Higgins

Sprache
Erscheinungsdatum
2013
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback)
Wir benachrichtigen dich per E-Mail.

Lieferung

  • Gratis Versand ab 16,99 € in ganz Deutschland! Mehr Infos.

Zahlungsmethoden

3,7
Sehr gut
194 Bewertung

Hier könnte deine Bewertung stehen.

Sprache
Englisch
Autor*innen
Jackie Higgins
Erscheinungsdatum
2013
Einband
Paperback
Seitenzahl
224
ISBN10
0500290954
ISBN13
9780500290958
Reihe
Bewertung
3,7 von 5 Sternen
Beschreibung
Why take a self-portrait but obscure your face with a lightbulb (Lee Friedlander, Provincetown, Cape Cod, Massachusetts (1968)? Or deliberately underexpose an image (Vera Lutter, Battersea Power Station, XI: July 13, 2004)? And why photograph a ceiling (William Eggleston, Red Ceiling, 1973)? In Why It Does Not Have To Be In Focus, Jackie Higgins offers a lively, informed defence of modern photography. Choosing 100 key photographs with particular emphasis on the last twenty years she examines what inspired each photographer in the first place, and traces how the piece was executed. In doing so, she brings to light the layers of meaning and artifice behind these singular works, some of which were initially dismissed out of hand for being blurred, overexposed or badly composed.